Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-dynamic-discovery-01

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] As we discussed at IETF 75, RadSec is a product name.  Can we use "RADIUS over TLS" and "RADIUS over DTLS" 
> (or maybe RAD-TLS and RAD-DTLS) instead?

  That's a reasonable idea.  I can update the DTLS document to say this.

> [BA] Given that RadSec is a product name, what should the SRV prefixes be? 
> _radtls._tcp?  _raddtls._udp? 

  I would say the latter two.  However, _radsec._tcp SHOULD also be used
for backwards compatibility.

>    This document contains no actions for IANA.  Maybe.  Not sure about
>    the labels "AAAS+RADSECT" and "_radsec._tcp.".
> 
> [BA] What about RADIUS over DTLS?  Does this document apply to that as well? 

  I would suggest so, yes.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>