Re: IPv6

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Given that existing tagged types are not suitable for generic use,  there
> doesn't seem to be an alternative to a new data type.  The question is
> what this document can or should say about that.

  I agree with David.  It should stick to recommended practices, and not
define new standards.

> While the Extended Attributes document is probably the right place to
> deal with this issue in depth, the question is whether something can
> be said in the Design Guidelines document, and if so, what.

  It should say what's bad about the current tags, and leave it to later
documents to decide how to fix them.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>