On Oct 5, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> It should say what's bad about the current tags, and leave it to later> documents to decide how to fix them. One approach might be to say just that: "For these reasons, the tagging scheme described in RFC 2868 is not suitable for use as a generic grouping mechanism. Further guidance in this area is left to future documents."
All of this dancing around, simply to avoid a non-normative reference to the RADIUS Extended Attributes document? Why?
-- to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>