Re: Draft RADEXT Virtual Interim Minutes

[Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>]

Hi Alan,
  In fact, before the Interim call we had made a revision to address all of your concerns and made  the specification to fit within the RADIUS data model, and to be deployed with minimum code changes as you wished.

Glen was expected to attend the call and state this. But I think he got sick and couldn't attend. 
Sigh.

I wish Glen a quick recovery.

Regards,

Behcet



----- Original Message ----
> From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
> To: Wojciech Dec (wdec) <wdec@cisco.com>
> Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>; radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Sent: Fri, October 23, 2009 10:26:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Draft RADEXT Virtual Interim Minutes
> 
> Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote:
> > In terms of "outstanding comments", with the exception of the datatype
> > debacle, it would be appreciated if you could point to ones that were
> > not addressed.
> 
>   The datatype "debacle" can be more correctly described as:
> 
> Me: Here's a review that results in no functional changes, but allows
> the specification to fit within the RADIUS data model, and to be
> deployed with minimum code changes
> 
> You: We change nothing.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: 





--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>