At the Virtual Interim, the RADEXT WG held a session devoted to
next steps on the IPv6 access work. During the session, David Miles suggested
a path forward for the IPv6 Access work that appeared to have consensus among
the Virtual Interim attendees.
In order to confirm that consensus, the RADEXT WG has issued a
Consensus Call to the mailing list (see http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2009/msg00636.html).
Please feel free to express your opinions on the list relating to the
consensus that was reached at the Interim.
From:
owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Wojciech Dec (wdec)
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 2:03 AM
To: Bernard Aboba
Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: Draft RADEXT Virtual Interim Minutes
Trying for the 4th time now:
- could
you confirm that what my mail outlined in terms of moving
forward is also your expectation?
-
Are you now convinced of "interest"? (and if not, or partially, then
on what grounds?)
-
could you point out (summarise)the issues that were not addressed?
Thanks,
Woj.