RE: Consensus Call on Broadband Forum Next Steps

["Dave Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>]

> What are/were these issues?

Issues are listed in the RADEXT Issues Tracker, located at:

http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/

The issues on your draft are 317, 321, 322.

In addition, there are discussions that are logged in the RADEXT WG mailing
list archives.

> As such we are still expecting a response to the questions posed,
> while tentatively planning to re-present a souped up version of
> the earlier draft(s).

The only question that I'm aware of is your question of October 23, that is
to say, "If we address the attribute design issues can this draft move
forward"?

That's not the way the WG works.  There are no shortcuts to addressing
commentary and posting revised drafts.  Your current draft is at -01, so
it's not like there has been a *lot* of revision activity.  The best way
forward is to propose *specific* text revisions to address outstanding
comments.  You can do that either by submitting a revised draft, or by
submitting sections of OLD and NEW text to the mailing list to show the WG
what changes you propose to make in the next draft revision. In many ways,
that's actually preferable.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>