Re: "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document

[Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>]

Hi Alan,



----- Original Message ----
> From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
> To: Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>
> Cc: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) <jsalowey@cisco.com>; Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>; "radiusext@ops.ietf.org" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Wed, January 6, 2010 2:54:24 PM
> Subject: Re: "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document
> 
> Avi Lior wrote:
> > Great!!!! But this also creates confusion.  Because what is RADIUS.....
> > 
> > IETF publishes a document that says its BAD to do something if it is RADIUS 
> and not bad if it is not RADIUS --- then it better define what is meant by 
> RADIUS.  Otherwise I have to live with the debate for the rest of my SDO life.
> 
>   The guidelines document says "SDOs do whatever the heck they want".
> 
>   If this isn't clear, we can put it in 50pt blinking neon text.

With this, I think that Radext is going to become the WG (possibly the only one) that does not care about SDOs.

Regards,

Behcet




--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>