Re: "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

>  Stop lying about what I said.

In an email long ago I  wrote:
>>> Not the old RADIUS model but rather the one that we are all living
>>> with today.  That model is not really different then Diameter.

This was your reply to the above:

 40% (or more) of current RADIUS deployments would disagree.
On 19-01-2010, at 14:44 , Alan DeKok wrote:

Can you explain why you think I was lying???

> Avi Lior wrote:
>> The current state of RADIUS is not the legacy state that the BCP seems
>> to be about either. As you pointed out - it applies to 40% of the market.
> 
>  Stop lying about what I said.
> 
>  Alan DeKok.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>