Re: Proposed resolution to guidelines document

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Dave Nelson wrote:
> My concern with this solution is that it's more than an editorial revision,
> and potentially overturns some elements of RADEXT WG, IETF and IESG
> consensus.  If we are to consider changing the the document in such a way,
> can this *really* be handled as an RFC Editor Note?

  It's also a way to show that the alleged large problems can be
completely resolved with small changes.

  If the fixes are so small, the problems cannot be that large.

  Alan Dekok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>