Re: "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document

["David B. Nelson" <dnelson@elbrysnetworks.com>]

On Jan 19, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote:

> Given that an update to the BCP is planned before it's even been
> published makes one wonder as to whether it's good to have it  
> published
> in its current form. Which this thread is all about.

I think you misunderstood Alan's comment.  The WG arrived at the  
consensus position that the BCP should address "traditional" RADIUS  
only and that any guidelines for the Extended Attribute format usage  
should be included in that document.  This is a document modularity  
and separation of concerns issue, not a statement about the  
correctness or longevity of the BCP.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>