Re: "Last Look" at the RADIUS Design Guidelines document

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

The tone of your responses is what I find offensive....

No Alan, the purpose of all my post it to get the document to be the best possible document.  One would start wondering what is the purpose of your posts...is it to protect your implementation, you beloved FreeRadius...hmmmmm I think it is.

We have seen this type of shameless self promoting from you before: one just needs to look at the section 2.1.2 of RFC5080 with its shameless taunting of what a wonderful job FreeRadius did.  NOT really actually ... a pretty obvious non-novel solution.  Such text has no place in an RFC. 

I am trying to keep this professional and not personal. You persist with personal, patronizing attacks on me and my comments...but if you want to continue down the lines of personal attacks and the chairs and AD are obviously happy with this...then I have better things to do.

If I were the only one that is raising these issues I would just walk away.  But I am NOT the only one.  So stop the personal attacks on my criticism of this body of work.

And to Bernard, and David act like chairs.

And to Dan, Bernard, David and Alan....I take you to the BAD email discussion with Glen. This is a caustic WG...Great job guys.


On 22-01-2010, at 15:29 , Alan DeKok wrote:

> Avi Lior wrote:
>> Can we start with this then...
> 
>  I see your false dichotomy and raise you one:
> 
>  Is the purpose of your post to be intentionally offensive, or did you
> simply not see the dozens of posts explaining the document?
> 
>  Alan DeKok.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>