[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (part I)

To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (part I)
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:51:57 +0100
Cc: "radiusext@ops.ietf.org" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <BLU137-W35CCBE493A9F2C672FE20C93520@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU137-W35CCBE493A9F2C672FE20C93520@phx.gbl>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)

Bernard Aboba wrote:
> [BA] My suggestion is that this material be moved to Section 2, since it doesn't relate to the
> reasons why publication is recommended as an Informational RFC. 

  OK.

  I've added that text with minor rewording, and integrated Section
2.3.1 as per your other suggestion.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (part I)
  - From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (Part II)
Next by Date: Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (part III)
Previous by thread: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (part I)
Next by thread: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (Part II)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread