RE: FW: Review of Radius Guidelines 11

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

In terms of process, my suggestion is to discuss proposed changes to the
text on the list, and incorporate them within a -12 version to be submitted
by the deadline.  At IETF 77, we can then go over what additional changes
(if any) are necessary. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:12 AM
To: Bernard Aboba
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: FW: Review of Radius Guidelines 11

Alan DeKok wrote:

  To summarize: the comments can be divided into a few rough areas:

- minor fixes
  - these should be addressed

- requests to define *new* methods/architectures in the document
  - these should be rejected

- requests to change the document or add explanations
  - I would appreciate suggested text.

  As editor, I welcome suggestions from the WG on how to improve the
document.  I have offered many suggestions in the past, and given the
volume of requested changes, ask for guidance from the WG on what to do
next.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>