Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (Part II)

[Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>]

Ignacio Goyret wrote:
> I'm just questioning the choice of MUST vs SHOULD.
> I've seen far too many specs that include MUSTs that should
> have been less restrictive.

  I agree.

> So, unless it hurts interoperability, I'd suggest replacing
> that MUST with a SHOULD, leaving the door open for servers
> to use other attributes, if their admins choose to do so.

  It won't hurt interoperability, so far as I can tell.

> Makes sense?

  Yes.

  I don't have strong opinions either way.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>