RE: RADEXT WG Last Call on "TLS Encryption for RADIUS" (Experimental)

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

I am starting work on a PROTO writeup for this document, on the assumption
that "lack of response implies consent".  If any issues become apparent 
in the course of that review, I'll post them to the list. 

While that's in progress,  WG participants are encouraged to:

a. Read the document, and post any thoughts to the list (even if that is
only
"the document appears ready"); 
b. Continue to make progress on closing issues within dependency documents 
(e.g. RADIUS over TCP, Status-Server); 
c. Post updates on implementation progress; 

Thanks for your efforts on this document!

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Winter [mailto:mail@stefan-winter.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 4:45 AM
To: Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: RADEXT WG Last Call on "TLS Encryption for RADIUS"
(Experimental)

Hi,

so...? Is the absence of comments enough to justify going on to IETF LC?
Would be much appreciated :-)

Stefan

Am 19.03.2010 20:59, schrieb Bernard Aboba:
> This is an announcement of RADEXT WG last call on "TLS Encryption for
> RADIUS", prior to sending the document to the IESG for publication as
> an Experimental RFC.
>
> The document is available for inspection here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-radsec
>
> The RADEXT WG last call will last until April 19, 2010.   If you have
> comments on the document, please send them to the RADEXT WG mailing
> list (radiusext@ops.ietf.org) in the format described on the RADEXT
> Issues list (http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/ ). 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>