Re: On issue 6: Avi review of I-D Action:draft-ietf-radext-design-13.txt

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

Read this:

Section 1.3 ....

 While SDOs and vendors MAY choose to create specifications not
   following these guidelines, this should be done only when those
   specifications are intended for use in scenarios within a limited
   scope of applicability.  Where general usage is possible, adhering to
   these guidelines is RECOMMENDED.

Unless i am missing something  -- the above states that they dont have to be compatible.



On 03-06-2010, at 16:00 , Alan DeKok wrote:

> Avi Lior wrote:
>> With which do you disagree when you say "No, it does not."
> 
>  It's a rather straightforward reading of the message:
> 
> You: ... the document asserts SDOs dont have to be compatible
>       with other SDOs.
> 
> Me:  No, it does not.
> 
>  Alan DeKok.

Avi Lior
avi@bridgewatersystems.com
office: +1 613-591-9104x6417
    cell: +1 613-796-4183



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>