[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[radext] #39: Section 4
#39: Section 4
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: bernard_aboba@â | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: milestone1
Component: design | Version: 1.0
Severity: Submitted WG Document | Keywords:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
4. IANA Considerations
This document does not require that the IANA update any existing
registry or create any new registry, but includes information that
affects the IANA, which:
* includes specific guidelines for Expert Reviewers appointed
under the IANA considerations of [RFC3575]
* includes guidelines that recommend against self allocation from
the RADIUS standard attribute space in other SDO RADIUS
Attribute specifications.
* recommends that SDOs request a Private Enterprise Code (PEC)
from the IANA, for use as a Vendor-Id within a Vendor-Specific
attribute.
[BA] BCPs cannot update standards track documents such as RFC 2865 or
3575. This should be made more clear. Recommended change:
4. IANA Considerations
This document has no action items for IANA. However, it does provide
guidelines for Expert Reviewers appointed as described in [RFC3575].
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/39>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>