[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Draft minutes of the RADEXT Virtual Interim



Minutes of the RADEXT Virtual Interim Meeting

Monday, October 11, 2010
8 AM - 10 AM Pacific Time

Chairs
Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba at hotmail.com>
Mauricio Sanchez <mauricio.sanchez at hp.com>

Agenda

8 AM - 8:10 AM Preliminaries (10 minutes)
     Attendance
     Note takers
     Agenda bash
     Document Status

Documents Completing IETF Last Call (40 minutes)

8:10 AM - 8:30 AM RADIUS over TCP, Alan DeKok (20 minutes)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-tcp

Major open issue is what port is to be reserved for Dynauth over TLS.
Should this port be reserved in the RADIUS over TCP document or in the
RTLS document?  Since we are talking about Dynauth over TLS, not Dynauth
over TCP, it's not clear why this has to be reserved in this document.

Resolution is to remove the port reservation for Dynauth over TLS.

8:30AM - 8:50 AM Design Guidelines, Alan DeKok (20 minutes)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-design-guidelines

Went over open Issues: 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 58.  
Most have been addressed in Design Guidelines -17.  Remainder
will be fixed in -18.

Once -18 is issued, the document will need to go back to IETF last
call; too many changes have been made to it.

RADEXT WG Work Items (40 minutes)

8:50 AM - 9:20 AM Extended RADIUS Attributes, Alan DeKok (30 minutes)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dekok-radext-radius-extensions

Alan DeKok and Avi Lior have been working on a new proposal for Extended
RADIUS attributes to replace the old (moribund) proposal.

The requirements are to enable more RADIUS Attribute Type space, and
provide standard support for "long" attributes as well as better
grouping.

The proposal is to "steal" one octet of "value" for extended types, and
allocate 4 attributes for this format:  241, 242, 243, 244.  This will
allow for ~1K new attributes, which should last a few decades at least.

To name the new attributes "dotted number" notation is proposed
(e.g. 241.1).  This is only relevant for the IANA registry, not the
protocol itself.

Grouping is enabled by defining a TLV data type.  This is already
in use in WiMAX, 3GPP2 and other SDOs.  Multiple TLVs can be in
one Extended Attribute, nested or concatenated, with nesting
limited only by TLV length (253/3 = ~80).  Depth of 5 is sufficient.

For "Long" Attributes two attributes are allocated:  245, 246. A
"flag" field is added to enable "more than 253 octets of data"
to be indicated.

The proposal also enables additional VSAs to be provided to vendors.
Some vendors have run out (and their request for additional Enterprise
Codes has been denied) so this will come in handy.

How do we move forward?  Some vendors (who can't get Enterprise Codes)
need this now; others will need it in 2-3 years when the RADIUS attribute
space could run out.

Sense of the room is that the proposal is promising; the draft will be placed on
the IETF 79 agenda for further discussion.

9:20 - 9:30 AM RADIUS over DTLS, Alan DeKok (10 minutes)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-dtls-00.txt

This document currently reuses existing RADIUS and Dynauth ports.  This is
convenient because no new ports are needed, and because DTLS and RADIUS can
easily be distinguished from each other.  If we asked for new ports for
TLS, DTLS, for both RADIUS and Dynauth, some eyebrows would probably be raised
(and rightfully so).

Implementations are currently in progress in RadSecProxy, Jradius and FreeRADIUS
(expected 1Q 2011).  Review from the implementers is an outstanding item.

Meeting Adjourned at 9:45 AM.