[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ssh authentication and service authorization questions
RFC 5607 uses Service-Type=Framed-Management. Presumably that would be used
in exchanges 1,2.
Section 6.1 states that the Framed-Management-Protocol attribute is used
with Service-Type=Framed-Management However, this isn't known until exchange
3 which will need to use Service-Type=Authorize-Only.
Maybe the solution is just to clarify the Section 6.1 text? I see no
inherent reason why a Framed-Management-Protocol attribute couldn't be
included in an Access-Request with Service-Type=Authorize-Only.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 11:59 AM
To: Bernard Aboba
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org; j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
Subject: Re: ssh authentication and service authorization questions
Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Several ideas come to mind:
Or use Service-Type = Authorize-Only?
It's intended for CoA, but there's no technical reason it couldn't be
used here.
i.e.
1,2) Access-Request for initial session (user + password)
Access-Accept contains State
3) For each service:
Access-Request + User-Name + State + Authorize-Only + ...
...
The State attribute ties the later Access-Requests to the first one.
The RADIUS server can authorize individual services, based on their
connection with the initial Access-Request.
IIRC, this is already being done for WiMAX, for authorizing individual
TCP connections.
Alan DeKok.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>