[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[radext] #82: Diameter compatibliity
#82: Diameter compatibliity
Section 4.5 states:
Proposals MUST include a Diameter compatibility section, although it
is expected that the work will occur purely within RADIUS or in the
transport, and therefore does not affect message data that is
exchanged with Diameter.
[BA] Since a Diameter compatibility section is no longer required, I
recommend that this be changed to the following:
Since it is expected that the work will occur purely within RADIUS
or in the transport, message data exchanged with Diameter SHOULD NOT
be affected.
--
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: bernard_aboba@â | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: milestone1
Component: Crypto-Agility | Version: 1.0
Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/82>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>