[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [radext] #85: Confidentiality Requirements
#85: Confidentiality Requirements
Changes (by bernard_aboba@â):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
Proposal is to change the existing text to the following:
Proposals MUST support the negotiation of cryptographic algorithms
for per-packet integrity/authentication protection.
It is RECOMMENDED that solutions provide support for confidentiality,
either by supporting encryption of entire RADIUS packets or
by encrypting individual RADIUS attributes.
This includes providing support for improving the confidentiality of
existing encrypted (sometimes referred to as "hidden")
attributes as well as encrypting attributes (such as location attributes)
that are currently transmitted in cleartext.
Proposals supporting confidentiality MUST support the negotiation
of cryptographic algorithms for encryption.
--
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: bernard_aboba@â | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1
Component: Crypto-Agility | Version: 1.0
Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: |
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/85#comment:1>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>