[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [radext] #3: Review of RTLS document (part 1, Technical)
#3: Review of RTLS document (part 1, Technical)
Comment(by stefan.winter@â):
- TLS negotiation text rewritten as suggested
- certificate validation from trusted sources: removed; this will be dealt
with in the dynamic discovery draft. Only a note in the non-normative
section remains.
- Client Identity: still needs some discussion, will be up on the slide
deck at IETF 80
- DAC: as discussed on the ML, all traffic should go through the same
port. A client does not have to be a DAC; if it's not, it is required to
NAK the DA traffic though.
--
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: bernard_aboba@â | Owner: stefan.winter@â
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1
Component: radsec | Version: 1.0
Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/3#comment:1>
radext <http://tools.ietf.org/radext/>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>