[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Question to implementers of Framed-IPv6-Route



The question has arisen as to what NAS implementers of Framed-IPv6-Route do with the attribute.

The attribute (defined in RFC 3162) is defined using language similar to that of Framed-Route in
RFC 2865, so one might assume a similar use.  However, RFC 3162 did not define a Framed-IPv6-Routing
attribute to parallel the Framed-Routing attribute defined in RFC 2865, so that it is possible that
implementers did not use Framed-Ipv6-Route in a similar way to the Framed-Route/Framed-Routing
attributes defined in RFC 2865.

If you have implemented Framed-Ipv6-Route on a NAS, please tell us what you do with the information:

1. Do you announce the routes via RA?
2. Do you look at Framed-Routing to determine if the routes are redistributed into an IGP?