Re: Final call for consensus poll for IANA #409959 NAS-Port-Type value request

[Avi Lior <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

If we would invent a new attribute then I would vote for Application-Id.

This is more inline with Diameter etc....

If we have support for that I would be more than happy to write it up.



-- Avi Lior
--Bridgewater Systems






On 09-06-11 05:08 , "Stefan Winter" <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> You cant use Service-Type because service type is also indicating
>> authorize only or authenticate only and call-check etc. and thus you
>>cant
>> express the Type of Service as well.  I pointed this out oh it seem like
>> 30 years ago when we were doing Chiba work.
>
>Well... would an IETF attribute like the "Extended-Service-Type-Info" as
>I mentioned earlier help you? I.e. your requests could be tagged:
>
>Service-Type = Authorize-Only
>Extended-Service-Type-Info = "WiMAX IP Mobility"
>
>or so?
>
>Stefan
>
>
>-- 
>Stefan WINTER
>Ingenieur de Recherche
>Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et
>de la Recherche
>6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi
>L-1359 Luxembourg
>
>Tel: +352 424409 1
>Fax: +352 422473
>
>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>