[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: çå: Q on Ver.-05 of draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access after IETF81 radext session
How about the replacement of 'Node-type' or 'Access-type'? or any other suggestion?
Best Regards,
Leaf
PS. http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types/radius-types.xml
-----Original Message-----
From: David B. Nelson [mailto:d.b.nelson@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 7:44 PM
To: Leaf yeh
Cc: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access@tools.ietf.org; radiusext@ops.ietf.org; fine sz; Qiujin; Wangshuxiang; draft-tan-v6ops-fast6-aaa@tools.ietf.org; wdec@cisco.com; roberta maglione; jacniq@gmail.com; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: çå: Q on Ver.-05 of draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access after IETF81 radext session
> The âUser-Typeâ can cover the following cases for both
> PPPoE and IPoE access model by now.
The proposed values for this attribute seem to describe properties of the attached host. In RADIUS, the term "user" refers to a human, for whom account and service provisioning has been established. I would suggest calling this proposed attribute something else, more accurately descriptive.