RE: çå: Q on Ver.-05 of draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access after IETF81 radext session

[Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>]

FYI and the records in the ML of Radext. Some other comments in the other separate emails from Dave seem to have not recorded in this Mailing List. (https://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2010/maillist.html#01005 ).


Best Regards,
Leaf


-----Original Message-----
From: Leaf yeh 
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 10:40 AM
To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
Cc: Dave Nelson; David B. Nelson
Subject: FW: çå: Q on Ver.-05 of draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access after IETF81 radext session

FYI and the records in the ML of Radext. Some other comments in the other separate emails from Dave seem to have not recorded in this ML.


From: Dave Nelson [mailto:dnelson@elbrys.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 7:07 PM
To: Wojciech Dec
Cc: Leaf yeh; David B. Nelson; draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access@tools.ietf.org; radiusext@ops.ietf.org; fine sz; Qiujin; Wangshuxiang; draft-tan-v6ops-fast6-aaa@tools.ietf.org; roberta maglione; jacniq@gmail.com; Bernard Aboba
Subject: Re: çå: Q on Ver.-05 of draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access after IETF81 radext session

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Wojciech Dec <wdec@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> On 17/08/2011 09:10, "Leaf yeh" <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> My issue is when we
>> try to mix in a fixed set of address assignment methods with the pool
>> names. ÂSeparation of concerns.
>
> This is interesting, given that the root of this thread is your email
> proposal for just that:
> https://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2010/msg00959.html

Actually, the text you've attributed to Leaf was my comment.

Regards,

Dave

David B. Nelson
Sr. Software Architect
Elbrys Networks, Inc.
www.elbrys.com
+1.603.570.2636