[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: COPS-PR
I guess I haven't read drafts in a long time...have I? :)
This is what SPPI mentions about client types
---------------------------------
7. Mapping of the MODULE-IDENTITY macro
7.1. Mapping of the SUBJECT-CATEGORIES clause
The SUBJECT-CATEGORIES clause, which must be present, identifies one or
more categories of provisioning data for which this PIB module defines
provisioning information. For use with the COPS-PR protocol, the
individual subject categories are mapped to COPS Client Types [COPS-PR].
-----------------------------------------------------
This implies that it is infact PIB module that identifies client-type to be
used. client type needed can be either 'all' or list of one or more
named-number enumerations where number is greater than zero. So Framework PIB
has SUBJECT-CATEGORY of 'all' & diffserv PIB has SUBJECT-CATEGORY that is as
of now not determined.
Last I heard however everyone was supposed to use same client type as the one
used in older COPS-DS ( 02 ). Atleast that's what the client type used in
Last interoperability tests was.
So I guess we should be asking this question in diffserv mailing list & not
here.
--Rajiv
On Thursday 29 March 2001 10:50, Vito Pinto wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rajiv Dighe" <rajiv@cplane.com>
> To: "vijains" <vijains@mail.cominsights.com>; <rap@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:14 PM
> Subject: Re: COPS-PR
>
> > Q1 is easy to answer. COPS-PR uses 02 as client-type. there is only one
> > client type for cops-pr that I know of.
>
> I have a doubt about this: reading the entire COPS-PR RFC and especially
> the "IANA Consideration" section we find that:
>
>
> 9. IANA Considerations
>
> COPS for Policy Provisioning follows the same IANA considerations for
> COPS objects as the base COPS protocol [COPS]. COPS-PR has defined
> one additional Decision Flag value of 0x02, extending the COPS base
> protocol only by this one value. No new COPS Client- Types are
> defined by this document.
>
> The last sentence explicitly says that no new Client-type are defined, so:
> Q1: what document specifies the client-type value of 2 ?
> Q2: if not specified, what Client-type COPS-PR clients have to use?
>
> Regards
> Vito Pinto