[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FW: draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession documents



Title: Message
I think we have cleared all hurdles... formal announcement is to come
from iesg secretary any day now (or so I expect).
 

Thanks,
Bert

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis-Nicolas Hamer [mailto:nhamer@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: vrijdag 18 oktober 2002 17:26
To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'
Subject: RE: FW: draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession documents

ok - thanks. I will wait for further instructions.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Hamer, Louis-Nicolas [CAR:AN22:EXCH]
Subject: RE: FW: draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession documents

I will try to get it approved asap. But it may take till Okt 31
 

Thanks,
Bert

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis-Nicolas Hamer [mailto:nhamer@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: vrijdag 18 oktober 2002 16:16
To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'
Subject: RE: FW: draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession documents

Hi Bert,

What should I expect next? When will the IESG decision be final so that I can contact IANA?
That sort of stuff...

Any advice will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

L-N


-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:35 AM
To: Steven M. Bellovin; Hamer, Louis-Nicolas [CAR:AN22:EXCH]
Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; Eric Rescorla (E-mail)
Subject: RE: FW: draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession documents


Thanks Steve. So Louis, pls submit the new I-D to
internet-drafts@ietf.org asap.

Thanks,
Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:smb@research.att.com]
> Sent: donderdag 17 oktober 2002 5:32
> To: Louis-Nicolas Hamer
> Cc: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; Eric Rescorla (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: FW: draft-ietf-rap-rsvp-authsession documents
>
>
> In message
> <9FBD322B7824D511B36900508BF93C9C04387D0F@zcard031.ca.nortel.com>, "
> Louis-Nicolas Hamer" writes:
> >
>
> >Bert, Eric, Steve,
> >
> >I think I correctly answered everything this time (got a
> little help from
> >Marcus Leech).
> >See below for comments.
> >
> >
>
>
> I believe that my concerns are basically satisfied.  I'm not thrilled
> with the recommendation to use static key, but...
>
> Bert, I guess we need a new I-D before I can clear my DISCUSS.
>
>               --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
>               http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)
>
>