[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP

To: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
Subject: Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:45:38 +0200
Cc: RRG Mailing List <rrg@psg.com>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=j6naXKhRU5crgkEStX3/jsPCxSZtjc5MR+aQM8nB1Jv3EfavU0KH6gPmJ5f4E6K+9Xt795QgbM7a02/xpWfpbItv3YwD3IJlEVc3Hp0y6Ao5wbEtLd/05PvIL78RCeewds6RI3vKwXbHgzRpiDvUepDb92rmv2bGQAGmQQekTFA=
In-reply-to: <E1IH0AM-0007Dy-2F@elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <46B186A7.1040500@nomadiclab.com> <20070802142220.GA6513@1-4-5.net> <46B35756.9070203@nomadiclab.com> <E1IH0AM-0007Dy-2F@elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)

On 2007-08-03 18:38, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
...

This is actually somewhat harder. If hosts actually checkedreachability, or really used all the A records they got back, it mightsuffice as part of transition to use the EID plus aggregatable Ainformation. (It's too bad DNS A records do not have preferences likeMX records, but we can't change that now.)


I'm glad you wrote "A" records. In the case of "AAAA" records,
the correct practice is to try them in sequence, using the RFC 3484
algorithm by default, and possibly a site-wide RFC 3484 policy.

    Brian

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
  - From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
- Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
  - From: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>
- Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
  - From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@nomadiclab.com>
- Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
  - From: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] SHIM6: portability, ULAs, mobility etc.
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] On the Transitionability of LISP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread