[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: [RRG] loc/id split and LISP



So it ‘s the EID but not DNS name that plays the role of identifier, besides, some host doesn’t have a DNS name at all.

 

 


发件人: HeinerHummel@aol.com [mailto:HeinerHummel@aol.com]
发送时间: 2007年10月1 11:08
收件人: xuxh@huawei.com; rrg@psg.com
主题: Re: [RRG] loc/id split and LISP

 

Certainly.And all the time.

Heiner

 

 

In einer eMail vom 01.10.2007 11:01:00 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt xuxh@huawei.com:

IP address within user site network is used as a component to identify a session, which is the role of IDENTIFIER. Of course, it also plays a role of LOCATOR in user site network. But in the transit network, the IP address mentioned above only has a role of IDENTIFIER.

 

Best regards,

 

Xu Xiaohu

 

<HRsize=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>

发件人: owner-rrg@psg.com [mailto:owner-rrg@psg.com] 代表 HeinerHummel@aol.com
发送时间: 2007101 9:28
收件人: rrg@psg.com
主题: [RRG] loc/id split and LISP

 

In my view the pair "DNS name / IPv4 address" is a true ( identifier / locator ) -pair, whereas EID and RLOC are rather two locators separated by some strict or loose hop.

 

Imho LISP is pure two loose hops routing. Isn't it ? LISP wouldn't make sense if there were no hop between EID and RLOC, would it ? (in that case, what would be the meaning of EID resp. RLOC ?)

 

So working out the double nature "identifier/locator" is first of all creating a special aura of research. 

 

Is this too critical ?

 

Heiner

 

</HR