[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RRG] Critique of Sprite-MTU: PMTUD, fragmentation etc.
- To: Routing Research Group list <rrg@psg.com>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- Subject: [RRG] Critique of Sprite-MTU: PMTUD, fragmentation etc.
- From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:08:01 +1100
- Organization: First Principles
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
I have a revised critique of Fred Templin's proposal:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-inetmtu-05
at my IPTM (ITR Probes Tunnel MTU) page:
http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/pmtud-frag/#sprite_critique
The three elements of the critique apply to the use of Sprite-MTU in
an ITR-ETR system (at least for IPv4). The third element may be
applicable to the many other uses which Sprite-MTU is intended to
help with.
In brief (please read the full critique before responding), they are:
1 - The ITR has to set up state even when a single short
(too short to be a problem for MTU limits) packet is
tunneled to an ETR.
2 - The ITR and ETR have to continually engage in Sprite-MTU
communications as long as packets are tunneled to the ETR -
and this should arguably start with the first packet.
Both these place a huge load on the ITR, for just a single packet -
which doesn't even need any MTU management. My proposal avoids such
overheads, by being triggered only by longer packets.
3 - The initial response of the ITR to a longer packet is to
send back a Packet To Big message to the sending host and
to tunnel the packet. The sending host will then resend
the packet (and probably subsequent packets) in multiple
small fragments - but the original packet may arrive at
the destination host and be acknowledged. This contradictory
response is likely to cause trouble for sending hosts,
including those implementing RFC 4821, as well as being a
source of extra packets, confusion etc.
This tunneling, MTU, fragmentation, PMTUD stuff is really challenging.
So far, Fred's proposal and my own IPTM (ITR Probes Tunnel MTU) are
the only two which are applicable to the ITR-ETR schemes we are
discussing on this list.
I would really appreciate some critical assessment of IPTM, and
likewise some confirmation or otherwise of my critique of Sprite-MTU.
- Robin
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg