I like to respond by using the RRG-mailinglist rather than the
RAM-mailinglist while assuming that
the RRG-mailiglist is for "free routing research" where backward -
compatability is not the first priority.
However free routing research may turn out to yield results which
enable IPv4 to continue, in principle, forever
(which does not mean that IPv4 can't use improvements). Remember,
Rekther's law talks about two alternatives. So far attention is only
given to one of them.
Heiner
In einer eMail vom 30.10.2007 19:26:03 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt
rw@firstpr.com.au:
RJ
Atkinson posted the first 3 links to the now-dormant RAM list. I
have
added another link to a potentially interesting discussion on
PPML.
- Robin
These 3 presentations (PDF) made at the
RIPE 55 meeting last week
in Amsterdam, NL might be of interest to a few
folks lurking here.
"IPv6 Allocation & Announcements"
by Randy
Bush
(IIJ):
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/bush-ipv6-allocation.pdf
IPv6
Transition & Operational Reality
by Randy Bush
(IIJ):
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/bush-ipv6-transition.pdf
"IPv4
Depletion & the Afterworld"
[Also called the "train wreck" talk in the
RIPE hallways.]
by Geoff Huston
(APNIC):
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-55/presentations/huston-ipv4.pdf
"Effects
of explosive routing table growth on ISP
behavior"
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-October/009714.html
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-October/009716.html
http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-October/009717.html
--
to
unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word
'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive:
<http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> &
ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg