Re: [RRG] Idea for shooting down

[Peter Sherbin <pesherb@yahoo.com>]

A level s assumes 10^7 to 10^8 prefixes. If a household or a person is looked at as
a non-transit site then should we expect about 3*10^9 prefixes at the s level?

Is there an empirical evidence that the ratio is always about 1:10 for Ps+x ->
Ps+x+1?

How much effort is required for pro bono formation of the initial Level 2, Region1?
What is the minimum number and the tier of ISPs that need to be involved?

Thanks,

Peter

--- Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> For a few weeks I've been mulling over what is probably
> an unrealistic idea that amounts to adding hierarchy
> to locator mapping. It's really quite hard to explain in
> pure ASCII and I missed the deadline anyway, but here
> it is for comments:
> 
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/DFZng.pdf
> 
>     Brian
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg