[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Mobility frequency

To: Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Mobility frequency
From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:58:18 -0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
In-reply-to: <47BD824F.3080101@cisco.com>
References: <8329C86009B2F24493D76B486146769A980E2D4B@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com>,<47BD824F.3080101@cisco.com>

Earlier, Eliot wrote:
% I didn't quite follow your conclusion...

I did not attempt to make a conclusion.  I made an observation
about existing systems and posed a question for folks to ponder.

My apologies that I was somehow unclear.

% The MIP and MIPv6 people developed their solutions based on a certain
% set of assumptions. taking into account any number of corner cases, as
% well as the general case.  What could another mobility solution offer /
% fix that MIP/MIPv6 didn't?

Also good questions to ponder.

Ran


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- [RRG] Mobility frequency
  - From: Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
- Re: [RRG] Mobility frequency
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] Are host-stack modifications allowed or disallowed ?
Next by Date: RE: [RRG] Are host-stack modifications allowed or disallowed ?
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Mobility frequency
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Mobility frequency
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread