[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RRG] Process proposal: Conceptual Summary and Analysis documents

To: "'Scott Brim'" <swb@employees.org>, "'Lixia Zhang'" <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Subject: RE: [RRG] Process proposal: Conceptual Summary and Analysis documents
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:13:12 -0800
Cc: "'rrg'" <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <47CDBC39.4060806@employees.org>
References: <4FB31981-796F-4A08-891B-D2879313D420@CS.UCLA.EDU> <47CDBC39.4060806@employees.org>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>


|I finally updated the wiki page to point to the LISP ALT and
|Interworking drafts.  We're almost done with an analysis doc.  Real soon
|now.

Thanks very much, we deeply appreciate it.

Tony




--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- Re: [RRG] Process proposal: Conceptual Summary and Analysis documents
  - From: Scott Brim <swb@employees.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] Are we solving the wrong problem?
Next by Date: RE: [RRG] Are host-stack modifications allowed or disallowed ?
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Process proposal: Conceptual Summary and Analysis documents
Next by thread: Re: [RRG] Process proposal: Conceptual Summary and Analysis documents
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread