[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Which Side to Control Ingress Link Selection?
Brian,
Brian Dickson wrote:
Hot-potato routing means ISP(sender) throws the traffic to the
ISP(recipient) as soon as possible, meaning ISP(recipient) usually bears most of the
long-haul costs. This in turn gets passed on to the recipient, in the form of the billing
model for traffic.
I may misunderstand this statement, but to me this is true for only half
of the path.
Once packets crossed a peering link or start to go down along
provider->customer peering links, hot potato is not necessarily a fact.
A customer can impact the Local-pref value of the paths it advertises to
its provider using the communities agreed upon with the provider
A customer can use prepending
A customer can use MED
If none of the above techniques are used then and only then hot potato
will play a role. I pay my providers to carry my bits after all...
Cheers,
Pierre.
Brian Dickson
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg