[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] on draft-meyer-lisp-eid-block-00.txt



My comment to the draft authors is that the request
for a /16 may be overly conservative; why not ask for
something more like a /8, /10, etc. (or even more) to
reduce fragmentation of the IPv6 address space.

I am fine with that, but what will the IANA, er IETF allow.

Dino

----

Internet Protocol Version 6 Address Space

(last updated 2007-07-19)

IPv6 Prefix           Allocation              Reference      Note
-----------           ----------              ---------      ----
0000::/8              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]      [1] [5]
0100::/8              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
0200::/7              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4048]      [2]
0400::/6              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
0800::/5              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
1000::/4              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
2000::/3              Global Unicast          [RFC4291]      [3]
4000::/3              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
6000::/3              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
8000::/3              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
A000::/3              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
C000::/3              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
E000::/4              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
F000::/5              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
F800::/6              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
FC00::/7              Unique Local Unicast    [RFC4193]
FE00::/9              Reserved by IETF        [RFC4291]
FE80::/10             Link Local Unicast      [RFC4291]
FEC0::/10             Reserved by IETF        [RFC3879]      [4]
FF00::/8              Multicast               [RFC4291]

----

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg