[RRG] Trying to find a path forwards

[Randall Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>]

Earlier, Dino wrote:
% So if you are using my argument about routers,
% then it is even more so with hosts.

The main point was that if the RG lets itself wedge on contrived
examples, then the RG can't make any progress at all here
and might as well go home now.

It is highly unlikely that this RG will be able to cause any
architectural change to the deployed IPv4 Internet.  There are
too many of everything (routers, hosts, embedded systems of
various sorts), and too much entropy in the IPv4 routing allocations
(probably more PI than PA, though I haven't counted recently)
to really make a substantial architectural change.  Sundry hacks
might or might not be deployable, but the kinds of architectural
change indicated in the RG charter are unlikly to happen for the
IPv4 Internet (and are certainly very hard in absolute terms).

By contrast, the IPv6 Internet still has relatively limited deployment
and relatively little routing allocation entropy.  The overwhelming
majority of IPv6 hosts and routers are still young enough that
upgrading either or both is not impractical.  Further, it is still possible,
just, that if the RG were to focus and execute on its charter,
and the IETF then ran with the input in a focused way, that some
meaningful architectural change to the IPv6 world could happen
BEFORE most of the Internet starts using IPv6 in a production way
(mindful, for example, of the Comcast presentations about the need
for IPv4::IPv6 NAT so that IPv6 only users can access IPv4 only content).
I'm not sure, perhaps some consider the SHIM6 work to be sufficient
in this regard, but clearly many do not consider the SHIM6 work
to be a solution to these issues.  Presumably the powers that
wrote the current RG charter do not perceive SHIM6 as a solution
to the concerns listed in the charter.

Again, if we look at the charter, this is chartered as a research
group, not an engineering group, and definitely not to work on
standards (as IRTF is never permitted to develop standards;
IETF is the place for Internet standards).

Cheers,

Ran


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg