Re: [RRG] What do we have consensus on?

["Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>]

Lixia Zhang wrote:
> On May 21, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Robin Whittle wrote:
>
> > Hi Tony and Lixia,
> >
> > Can you list what decisions the RRG has achieved consensus on?
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> instead of replying to each of your bullets below, here is what I 
> thought where we are at this time: recall the discussions we started in 
> April following the message on RRG process clarification:
>
>     We need to first come to some agreement on the very highest
>     level branches in the decision tree (e.g., do we do map-and-encap
>     or translation or ???)
>
> Towards the above goal, one step is to first reach a shared 
> understanding of exactly how many branches we face at that highest level 
> branching point.

MY personal start on high level branches (something akin to facets, and 
the aspects of each top level facet, although probably not strictly a 
faceted taxonomy)), along with some suggested terminology is in
draft-halpern-rrg-taxonomy-00.txt.

While that document can definitely still use further clarifications, I 
would appreciate comments from other folks on its content before I 
produce -01.

Thank you,
Joel M. Halpern

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg