[RRG] Conceptual vs. specific - another discussion list?

[Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>]

I understand that for now, the co-chairs are directing the RRG
towards more conceptual discussion of the design space, without
specific engineering details, particularly of potential solutions.

I don't have much to contribute in that regard, because I can't
constructively think about various forks in the road without going
down each fork as far as I can, finding potential solutions and
discussing them in as much engineering and deployment detail as
possible.  Other folks are keen to engage in this sort of thing too,
but we need to do it without disrupting the high-level only discussions.


I have a bunch of RRG messages to read and respond to - probably
next week.  But my responses would probably fall outside the scope
of this "high-level only" conceptual discussion of the design space.

If such messages are not appropriate for this list at present, can
someone suggest an alternative?  Routing Research Gory Details
perhaps?  Routing Research, Engineering and Deployment?

I could run a list with public web archives myself, but it might be
better if someone not so involved in the discussions ran the list.
A list under the IETF or IRTF banner would probably be best.

Should we continue the discussions which don't suit the RRG on the
RAM list?


  - Robin


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg