[vaf@cisco.com: Re: [RRG] Moving forward...]

[Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>]

Meta-note: the "CC" you used to send your original message to the RRG list
was invalid and unrepliable. I wonder how many replies were lost because
people ignored the mailer errors.

	--Vince

----- Forwarded message from Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com> -----

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:05:03 -0700
From: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: 'rrg' <rrg@psgcom>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Moving forward...

> Last week we did a consensus check on the following:
> 
> |Our recommendation should be applicable to IPv6.  It may or 
> |may not also apply to IPv4, but at the very least must provide 
> |a path forward for IPv6.
> 
> 
> It's my judgement that we have rough consensus on this.  There is dissent,
> notably from Robin and Bill, but overall, it seems that we have rough
> consensus.

FWIW, put me into the more-rough, non-consensus camp that thinks providing a
solution for IPv4 is a requirement.

Speaking for myself only.

	--Vince

----- End forwarded message -----

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg