RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications

["Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>]

|I don't find this OK in an IPv6 environment. We've worked very hard for
|years to make sure that IPv6 deployment doesn't require NAT, and it
|is not a correct assumption that applications can support NAT kludges
|for IPv6 just because they must do so for IPv4 (including IPv6-IPv4
|packet level translation).


As has been said before, all of the translation options are basically
architected NAT.  

To adapt to this, applications can either perform NAT kludges or change to
truly operate on a separate and clear identifier.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg