On Jul 16, 2008, at 8:27 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
PS: FWIW, I understand issue (c) as being of less grave nature than issues (a) and (b). Issue (c) is an implementation issue, NOT an architectural issue like issues (a) and (b).Absolutely not. It's an architectural issue in the session layer, when session IDs have no universality.
let me understand this better: my understanding is that six/one router (it ought to be renamed to just IPv6 Address translator, or 6AT) performs a one to one matching. So although the exact value of the "ID" may not be exactly the same before or after an 6AT, nonetheless the session is uniquely identified -- would that be considered as having universality?
LixiaPS: in the above I used Brian's terminology, but my personal view is that, in the long run, session layer should move away from using IP address entirely.
-- to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg