[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt

To: "'xuxiaohu 41208'" <xuxh@huawei.com>, "'Iljitsch van Beijnum'" <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
From: "Tony Li" <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:55:53 +0100
Cc: "'rrg Group'" <rrg@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <fa13e4611322.1322fa13e461@huawei.com>
References: <A21C9B11-86C2-47C4-9623-7829ADBA1287@muada.com> <fa13e4611322.1322fa13e461@huawei.com>
Reply-to: <tony.li@tony.li>

 

|I also believe so. then my question is Does every host need a 
|FQDN name in the future?


It would seem like it would be no different than today.  If one had a host
without a FQDN, then you would need to refer to it using a full 128 bit
locator and identifier.

Tony


--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

Follow-Ups:
- re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>

References:
- [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
- Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
  - From: xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
Previous by thread: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
Next by thread: re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread