[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required

To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:15:01 +1200
Cc: Routing Research Group <rrg@psg.com>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NC3U5weGUsiECSpi7PT5rcRZq8FfWU/6u6OUtQmpKr5+r/U8q9LpirPYp+8PexD1df yC7jAgg5OoqiQBBWprhjbDM7qbCiJ9Dv7+mpTyE8rAm6vRmwLqEYiH8eWQPr0Gh6Ijab EFIhiYsnfvHZq6CogNvoW3UPCnolPg+NeI/tc=
In-reply-to: <48958531.9010706@firstpr.com.au>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <489549BB.5090503@firstpr.com.au> <48954EAF.6030408@gmail.com> <48958531.9010706@firstpr.com.au>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

>> > [Pouzin74] Pouzin, L., Interconnection of packet switching networks,
>> > 7th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Supplement,
>> > pp. 108-109, 1974.


>    Pouzin, L., "A Proposal for Interconnecting Packet Switching
>    Networks," Proceedings of EUROCOMP, Brunel University, May 1974,
>    pp. 1023-36.

I suspect those are basically the same paper, but when I went looking,
I could only find the Hawaii version, via the British Library iirc.
I'm not supposed to post it, for copyright reasons.

   Brian

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg

References:
- [RRG] Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
- [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
  - From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
Next by Date: Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite
Previous by thread: Re: [RRG] Re: Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required
Next by thread: [RRG] Short explanation: Ivip6's "Core Routing Label Forwarding"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread