[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RRG] Renumbering...
On Sep 3, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Tony Li wrote:
If PI is available, then all users will tend to cling to it,
avoiding any
other possible solution. Our entire job is to give them an
alternative.
Or, we provide a mechanism that allows the users to continue to use
their 'PI addresses' but disassociates the network topological
significance from those 'addresses'.
I'm with Noel here about being depressed. I fear discussions about
changing business models or forcing users to deploy IPv6ng or define
new APIs and demand OS vendors and application writers to rewrite
their code yet again is, to quote Noel, "an utter waste of time". It
has been two years since the IAB Amsterdam workshop kicked off this
round of RRG and as far as I can tell, there hasn't been consensus on
much of anything other than we should "do it right".
I've asked in the past but have not gotten an answer: what are the
constraining assumptions RRG is working under in terms of timeframes
and infrastructure replacement?
Thanks,
-drc
--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg