Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...

[Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>]

Hi Tony,

I agree.  The recent rough consensus requiring no renumbering
precludes any practical solution.

You wrote:

> I'm not ready to say that there aren't transition schemes that
> could get around this, but these are the issues that I'm seeing.

I am:

There is no scalable routing system - or transition scheme to a
scalable routing system - which can meet our goals of being
attractive to end-users and generating real scalability benefits if
it is not allowed to require most small end-user networks (all PI
and probably most small PA) to renumber once when adopting the new
system.

  - Robin

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg