Re: [RRG] Re: ILNP Critique

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>]

> The aspect that I especially appreciate about ILNP, however, is that,
> like TCP SACK, or ECN, or SHIM6, or HIP, it is relatively cheap to
> deploy locally, and benefits accrue to any two communicating hosts which
> both support it, without requiring changes in the core infrastructure,
> and without degrading communications with non-ILNP nodes. This was not
> true of GSE.

Which is also true of shim6, by design.

   Brian

--
to unsubscribe send a message to rrg-request@psg.com with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg