[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mailing list and draft charter for new multihoming BOF/WG



Pekka Savola wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

We will request a shim6 BOF at the next IETF, and also start the
process of forming at WG. But first, we need your comments on
the draft charter.


Two typos:

-The shim6 WG is to produce specfifications for a complete IPv6 site
-multihoming solutions based on the architecture developed by the IETF
+The shim6 WG is to produce specifications for a complete IPv6 site
+multihoming solution based on the architecture developed by the IETF

Major comment:

The text, again, makes a huge presumption that just by solving the connection survivability problems, we have a complete IPv6 site multihoming solution. That may be true for certain kinds of sites, but this seems like a far fetch in general.


Well, Geoff owes us the general solution architecture document. When we test that against RFC3582, we can address your question...

   Brian