RE: multi6-functional-dec and re-homing

[<john.loughney@nokia.com>]

Brian,

> Also, don't forget that our job right now is to agree on a
> precise charter for shim6, and that will include ruling some
> items out of scope, even if they are needed for the IPv6 Internet
> as a whole. Let's focus on having a finite menu of precise objectives
> that can be turned into standards track RFCs...

I agree - I think I sent some suggestions in on what I thought would
be reasonable charter items; I could try to reformulate them based upon
the discussion, unless Kurtis is already reving the charter.

John